29 APRIL

It is said that a cabinet meeting decision of the reconstruction proposal of Fundamental Law of Education is made,

and the existence of patriotism is set as the object of evaluation of children still more. Is it foolish?

Do you want to make Japan into totalitarianism society without vitality like North Korea?

　

If you want to spread love for your home district and the leader of a country will wish, an attractive human being should be brought up,

and you should build a social foundation with having an active part played so that it may become the world where a dream and hope are felt.

Then, the cheek was set, and everyone is pleased with it, it is loved with pride to a hometown,

and if it is for protecting it, even the body progresses and is stretched. If it digs up anew even in history,

even if it will seldom be evaluated until now, men like the model of a wonderful way of life should be sleeping.

　

One [ ruined / a world's ] of the reasons is that the opportunity to employ,

and polish and demonstrate [ dance for bubble business, and ruin oneself, or the company which could not but be dependent

on public works or the big business collapses in large quantities, and ] power decreased.

I think that I am because a possibility of meeting the adult who is doing the way of life which can give the hope

which can be regarded as wanting for children to be pleased with another and to imitate the way of life is decreasing sharply

(having also set in the past also in the present).

Moreover, it should turn out by changing a viewpoint so that how to study history may also study old not a historical view

but more various useful various human relations based on national formation that it is filled to the teachings

which point out that the present time has missed.

What should be done must be the environmental structure into which the attractive human being grows up here and there,

and cannot be the overall and formal management something which recites "patriotism."

　

The adults who only have following a strong man in livestock as for ability are going to shut their eyes to their shortcomings,

and make only formal management organization for strength and the convenient human being for themselves.

If such a thing is done, talented people's vitality which any organizations constitute is lost, and ruin has only been enhanced.

Is it outdated, and do you give the people which one piece of charm with a narrow view does not have,

either a mailbox of a politician and a bureaucrat, and use to shoulder to the status of brandishing power as a stop any longer?