、
|
|||||
Moreover, you have to advise about the prime minister's remark. The prime minister's circumstantial judgment is considered to already have trodden in the domain of a fancy, and is very dangerous. If it is asked by the journalist about Yasukuni Jinja worship among this one week and my memory will become surely although it has answered, "I think that I have obtained an understanding (Yasukuni Jinja worship) also from Japanese people also from South Korean President Romuhyonalso from the Chinese Kokintao president", I will consider [ having only answered vaguely "it judged appropriately" at a talk, and ]. The wishiful thinking as subjectivity and objective present condition recognition have become muddy here. The prime minister of one country closes an eye and an ear from the inconvenient reality for himself, and the thought which gets cold [ the back ] makes it the figure which is interpreting the situation in the domain of a fancy.
It is because it is not different from the leader in wartime at all. For example, the battle in the Philippines was carried out at hand, and announcement that the large success in battle of a Japanese army went up by the offing aviation game of Taiwan was made in Showa 19. Although it was called "the sinking aircraft carrier 10, the battleship 2, the battle cruiser 3, and the destroyer 1", the actual success in battle found later was the 1/10 or less success in battle. However, although strategic large conversion will be performed to Leyte, the Leyte game based on this wishiful thinking information finished with the complete defeat north in Japan the plan with which the Imperial-Headquarters staff officer must have fought a decisive battle from the first based on this incorrect information in the Philippines and Luzon as "being the golden opportunity which should beat just now Private First Class where the navy disappeared", and 80,000 people (97%) were able to live and were not able to return.
I think that there are many people Japanese people cannot yet do distinction with subjectivity and the object to speak frankly. Japanese people think that they have said the thing of the character same as emotional and logical thinking being weak in another language. Objective situation grasp regards it as possible only after the power rectified by logical thinking attaches its feeling information influenced by feeling. I who do a picture specially realize that the characteristic of receiving what was desired and eliminating what is not pleasing is one of those which are called man's sensitivity every day. However, in having judged for the feeling information based on subjectivity (wishiful thinking) if compelled in not knowing and an important determination which will expose people's life to danger, if it was a thing on art, it cannot desire to deal with an actual problem rationally etc. How does Prime Minister Koizumi consider the subjective thing used as the cause that Japan was defeated in that war with the amount-of-resources difference which it was not able to incline too much for convincing (exclusive support for spiritualism, such as the "Japanese spirit"), objective information gathering and situation grasp were not enough able to be carried out, and it was not able to elaborate on a rational strategy? Prime Minister Koizumi regards the important teachings which the persons killed in war of that war replaced with the life, and left to us as having trampled down on foot, using "a memorial service" as a mouth. The leader of a country cannot understand such a thing, but I think then that this country does not have the future so that making a policy judgment based on one's
subjectivity may be allowed. |
