@
|
![]() |
10 September
|
It seems that the society which permitted diversity and was able to carry out intension of it succeeds in cherishing rich culture,
and prospered even if seen historically. It is said that the Catholic, the Judaist, and the Muslim lived together
and wealth was brought to the society of Toledo taking advantage of each special feature when Toledo in Spain prospered.
It is said that the rich cultural creativity which existed until now was lost, and a decline also of such Toledo was enhanced
when a part of influence (Catholic) tended to monopolize wealth and began to have eliminated other influence.
Once, the United States is generous to an immigration person, and thinks that it supports the present prosperity
that excellent talented people gathered from all over the world. Immigration also becomes tight.
However, maintenance influence increases in order that rich people may monopolize rights,
and have not excellent talented people stopped restrictions being able to gather easily, either?
I am worried that abandon what is considered itself [ national ], all the things that cannot be divided among simple language are cut off
in the world to the extent that it inclines toward one side by Populism, the width of social culture becomes thin,
and it becomes the stubborn and thin society where the degree of permission is low,
and it may run out of steam, and may isolate and decline.