There are sad realities,such as terrorism. I think that human beings are now asked about "whether the others' pain is known." Here, is that it is not in sight unless it does its best in "the others' heart" missed unexpectedly? "The others' heart" has only guessed out of the frame with which an individual can understand "his heart." Probably, "the others' pain" does not have a vanity lever without efforts to open the frame of one's heart instead of what looks automatic freely, and think of the others from there. |
|
|
(It is presumptuous) If problem solving other than exchange of violence is explored,
we will regard efforts to understand "the others' pain" as it being necessary to keep in mind further
