13 August

It is thought that the reality of the fear of war is being lost by people in recent years.

The power of avoiding the last means of war (it being able to set to diplomacy) will work,

while the fear of war is in many people's "heart."

However, if the reality is lost from people's feeling, it will become difficult to suppress the influence

that diplomatic problem solution will be easily carried out in war.

When memory faded when seeing people's history then, a similarly foolish war has been repeated.

It is thought that such a tendency is increasing the present age.

(Since especially Japan is considered with the national disposition which tends to be passed by "air" like during wartime,

it is much more anxious about it.)

　

"Whether even if man becomes when, do repeat the same fault and it is spread" is also the theme of the whole life as my artist.

Probably, there is no specific medicine "what is necessary is just to carry out this etc.

" Where did the former people miss [ why ] their foot on the leg?

I can think that there is no method besides studying it and making it not repeat the same thing.

　

Why do Japanese people and a Japanese organization make introspection (analysis) weak in many cases

(or why could it come without thinking as important?)?

All past failure has been smothered. Proof was burned and buried. And if the ringleader dies, a crime will no longer be asked.

Therefore, it becomes the obstacle which still reexamines the fact and has

become the cause of allowing rampancy of strange beautification illusion.

For example, the United States also keeps altogether the data which become disadvantageous for their own country,

and, 30 years after, is doing general public presentation.

It is because the United States itself is keeping data and it opens to the public that it can ask whether the strategy of the United States

under war is against Hague Convention.

The proof of the Japanese army having made 731 units develop a bacteriological weapon, and having conducted the spraying experiment [ it ],

in China is canceled entirely, and is free from those who insist on data seldom remaining to a good thing "Such a fact could not be found."

Is such destruction of evidence beneficial to Japan of the present or the future sure enough?

　

In Japan, if it is said that war experience is handed down from generation to generation,

it can be understood that it surely becomes large to appeal against the damage of an atomic bomb or an air raid on Tokyo.

However, how much Japanese who can reply to the question "why Japan began the United States and war"

and there "what kind of chances of victory there to have been" are needed?

Although it became war in which only damage is finally conspicuous, Japan devised primarily and he was an assailant

in the countries of the Korean Peninsula, mainland China, and the Pacific Ocean.

(Ignorant people also supported the reckless plan of the military authorities)

While telling a postwar Japanese war experience and reflection as an assailant,

I think that succession of the experience as a teacher should be made.

　

Moreover, was Japan doing sufficient efforts and a sufficient device in negotiation diplomacy, before appearing in the last means of war?

Also about the end of the war, when acceptance of the Potsdam Declaration was one more week early,

possibly an excuse to drop an atomic bomb was given to neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki.

There is no knowledge of not only the amount of resources but a psychological warfare or information warfare.

Has the present-day Japanese conquered the misery to which the conclusion which makes communication weak arrived only

at emotional violence motion?

　

If man does not learn, probably he will only repeat the same thing. I think that it should know that

it is the language by means of which the language used for the war affirmation of "differing from that time now"

was also repeated historically.

However a time may be different, since man's character or desire do not change.